Father Ed's Blog

A Catholic priest reflects…

What is truth?

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

We live in an era of pessimism and self doubt. Empires rise and fall and the Western Empire is now itself showing signs of advanced decay. It looks like the Roman Empire before it, at the end of its cycle. Then a man named Hannibal marched over mountains with Elephants and struck at the heart of Rome. A symbolic gesture to show to the world a chink in the armour of the once unbeatable giant.  It sent shock waves through the globe and Rome’s self doubt exacerbated until it fell. A once mighty Empire collapsed on itself completely.

For us it wasn’t elephants but aeroplanes sent crashing into twin towers. A strike at the heart of the West, to underline our own growing vulnerability. The terrorists hoping to increase self doubt and one senses their success in all the chaos and division regarding Trump, Brexit and the wider collapse of trust in mainstream media and politics. We are a culture in meltdown and panic is evident. The Judea-Christian faith, which built and sustained us, is rounded on and rejected. And, as happens at the end of Empires, moral decadence kicks in; resources freely given to sustain the vision in the public square diverts to the pockets of the wealthy.

Pilate famously asked ‘what is truth?’. Ever the question of oily politicians who fail to exercise justice. Of those who have lost faith in the central vision of the culture they inhabit but who nevertheless feed off it parasitically. (As modern atheistic secularists gorge on what remains of a once Christian nation, claiming its virtues and accomplishments, its sense of justice, liberalism and tolerance, for their own.)

When we lose all faith in moral certainty the world grows grey. There is no black or white, no ideal to strive for, no dream to sustain or ultimate goal to achieve…so each may do as he pleases. Always birth rates dry up and economies fail. The only point to life becomes the hoarding of wealth for transitory pleasure. The chasing of hedonistic fantasy. Relativism becomes the new religion for pleasure demands no boundary or restriction. The culture falls into chaos and confusion for it is never good news for a nation to find itself without faith or shared purpose.

This loss of faith then leads to rejection of identity and history, to self doubt and capitulation of all that went before. As the founding Christian vision fades in the West we witness everything being thrown into question. Why the very notion of truth crumbles before our eyes! “What is truth?” the West asks Christ once again. Consider the rejection today even of scientific facts regarding men and women.  Obvious truths determined by wombs and willies give way to a confusing notion of multiple genders based on sentiment alone. From cis-queer to agender, to trans-this or that. Be whoever or whatever you desire. Because the old order is discarded and there is rebellion against God. Who is he to impose the natural law upon us? Welcome to 1984.

This self doubt is also evident in the Western church. Where the plain facts of scripture and tradition, doctrines unquestioned for thousands of years, are suddenly doubted and rejected. Relativism runs amok amongst the liberalising voices of our day especially amongst the hierarchs of a certain generation. Sure Jesus  taught marriage was for life… but we who believes it or can live it anymore?

This questioning voice, like the wider culture we inhabit, stems from despair. The modernist loves the church, his/her hope is that worldly reform might save it! But they no longer hold enough supernatural faith in God- and in his eternal word- to sustain it. So they seek to save it themselves, modernising and changing, watering down and appeasing… because they no longer believe that its own teaching can sustain it. It is a voice of rebellion, echoing the culture of despair, shouting out against the founding principles of Christianity – against her teaching on marriage and the family, against the creation of man and woman as equal but different, against God himself!

Should it surprise us when it also hits out, with scorn and derision, at the opposing voice of orthodoxy- at those who would urge us to remain faithful to the teaching of the church? No because firm faith in this age of growing despair seems alien and impossible, rigid and out-dated to those losing faith. They spurn the only medicine that might save them. The relativist loathes strong faith for he himself no longer believes! Yes- at the heart of modernist thinking is fear- a loss of faith. A desire for a church that conforms to  world not one that might conform the world to Christ.

An indulgent self doubting culture can have no happy ending. Nor an indulgent and self doubting church. Before long the lean and vision driven will prosper and overtake. So if the West wants to halt decline it MUST somehow re-disover its founding principles. The same is true for the Church in the West. To stem decline- it too must re-discover a sense of confidence in Christ and his eternal word. It must defeat the challenge of modernism- the greatest heresy of all time.

But here is the sting in the tail. Many of the current leadership in the church represent the problem not the cure; they witness to the chaos and confusion. We might consider here the growing division caused by the current papacy which seeks to re-introduce relativistic agendas of the 1970’s. That which attacks orthodox faith as too rigid whilst ever emphasising doubt over faith, sentiment over reason and a worldly sense of mercy over clarity and fidelity. The bar set to meet man where he is not elevated to raise him up to the standards of Christ.

What does it say when we have a Pope who is flavour of the month amongst those who attack the faith, from within or without, whilst he only bewilders and dismays those whose desire is to be faithful? Why does his teaching resonate not with the voice of the church in all ages, but with prevailing attitudes of a decaying culture and its sexual revolution? With the greatest respect one must question, at this time, the direction of the Church since Pope Benedict resigned. For what is there to conclude about the current refusal to answer the dubia save fear about what such answers reveal? Not firm unquestioning faith in Christ – I suspect- but that modernist desire to conform to the culture at plain cost to the faith.

I end with words of encouragement for those confused and dismayed. The Christian faith has survived many crises, has stood the test of time as empires rise and fall. It may be dying in the West and in some of its current leadership- but it flourishes in the East and on the ground where orthodoxy is enabled to flourished. The church has been thrown to the dogs before and each time it was the dog that died. So hold the line, be faithful and pray. We are a resurrection people and need not fear death of any kind. And looking to the grass roots and to the future, I suspect the swing in the pendulum is coming….till then stand by the cross and weep. Stand by and for Jesus Christ and the Gospel, even as he is again rejected, question, mocked and attacked. The dawn will come, the approaching feast of Easter guarantees it.

Print Friendly

Previous

Lent Charity 2017

Next

Mgr. Newton to host important meeting

14 Comments

  1. Steve G

    Hannibal crossed the Alps in 218 BC. His force, we are told, included thirty-nine war elephants. This was over one hundred and fifty years before Julius Caesar first set sandal in Britain. Rome fell in 476 AD according to Gibbon (who was something of an authority on the subject). The “truth” of this posting appears to be that there are thirty-nine elephants in Father Ed’s room.

    • Admin

      The cause of the decline of the Roman Empire is a very complex matter, multifaceted as is the decline of the West in our day, one that could warrant a dissertation! Certainly Hannibal was not solely responsible- I didnt intend to suggest that. And I take the point about timescales. But I have heard it stated by historians that his attack caused a loss of confidence in the utter strength of Rome which led to an erosion of confidence which ultimately contributed to the decline. I rather like the similarity with that attack and the one on the twin towers – which I have also seen linked- so shared it.

      • Pat

        Complex indeed.
        I have encountered reports which mention among other things, population decline, possible disease (epidemic?) and tree-ring evidence for climate deterioration at the critical time. Those are just some more ingredients to ‘stir into the pot’. No doubt more information will come to light in future.

      • Alessandro

        Can you name the historians you refer to as the basis for your interesting Hannibal theory?

        • Steve G

          I think you are being a little harsh here, Alessandro. How can Father Ed peddle his alt.history without recourse to a couple of alt.historians?

  2. Neil

    I completely agree with the general gist of your article. The only point I would question is the suggestion that Hannibal’s attack on the Roman Empire presaged its demise. Hannibal crossed the Alps in 218 BC when both Carthage and Rome were vying for supremacy. Rome subsequently won the Punic Wars, destroying Carthage completely. Arguably Rome did not reach the peak of its power until the reign of Augustus about 200 years later. It is possible to chart the decline of the Roman Empire from period post-Augustus, but not really from the time before his reign, unless one sees the demise of the Republic under Julius Caesar as the turning point (c. 48 BC).

  3. David Knowles

    Rome didn’t reach the height of its power until under the Emperors. The real cause of its demise was the steady influx of people from outside the empire over two centuries. This resulted in the breakdown of law and order until barbarian armies finally began to carve up the weakened state.
    Most of the thousands who entered the empire came originally as refugees, both genuine and economic. This is the real parallel with the Europe of today. The romans were largely unable to control the forces driving these immigrants from beyond the empire.Hopefully it will not be beyond the capabilities of the present day international community to sort out the Middle East and prevent European civilisation returning to a second dark age.
    The decline of the empire was a mixed blessing for the Church allowing as it did the successor of Peter to inherit the mantle of the emperor and convert the barbarians. Christianity triumphed in the end, even becoming a little to much immersed in triumphalism and authoritarianism as time went by!
    The development of human understanding of sexuality must impact on the way doctrine is understood and the relationship of the church with the world must also change. We no longer live in the Middle Ages and the church can no longer behave as it did then. We were officially given a conscience by Vatican II but the reactionary course taken by JP2 forbade us to use it.
    Francis and hopefully his successors have returned to the aspirations of the Council. I firmly believe that time will exonerate the tempering of casuistry with mercy. The church will endure by travelling with and not ruling over the faithful.

    • MV

      There is a slight historical oversimplification here. Most of the Barbarians – the Goths (both Ostro- and Visi-), the Vandals, Alans etc. – who were overrunning the Empire were already converted. They had, however adopted the heretical Arian form of Christianity. Catholic Christianity did not become firmly established as the dominant creed in the West until after the baptism of Clovis, King of the Franks.

  4. David Knowles

    PS
    In my view JP2 was canonised for the manner of his death and for the way his courage and sanctity underlined the dignity at the end of life.
    The fact of his bravery and sanctity nor his other achievements does not imply that during his time at the tiller he did not oversteer the ship.
    I am still mystified by the way his successor jumped ship and the real reasons for it. His resignation of the papacy was in such a marked contrast. If we are really honest, most of us were pole axed and in some way the papacy itself was diminished.

    • Mike

      Benedict had asked to retire a few times before being elected Pope, and yet when the call came he took on the burden without a complaint and in many ways his eventual resignation was inevitable. Some men are able to merge themselves into the office of the Papacy like all the previous popes in our living memory and can die in office, but Benedict somehow sees the office of Pope as separate from himself and I think that in contrast he has enhanced the Papacy. Maybe if the Cardinals could see this separation as well they would elect a man who is younger and who like Benedict seeks to keep the church and the deposit of faith in tact for future generations.

  5. Pat

    “I am still mystified by the way his successor jumped ship”see See what Benedict see what Benedict himself has to say on the issue:-

    http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2016/08/25/benedict-xvi-says-he-felt-he-had-a-duty-to-resign-because-of-his-health/

    I saw something rcently to the effect that he is now in a slow but steady decline, very frail and blind in one eye.

  6. Patrick Fahey

    Well written commentary Fr Ed, all too true for those with eyes to see. The commencement of the downfall of the West however began long ago at the Reformation, the cracks of which are widening; still since VAT2 into the Church itself, the last bastion that holds the west and it culture together. Mr Knowles refers to the Romans collapsing due to the influx of foreign cultures, again the parallels are clear, we lose our Christian heritage we do not become non-Christian, other religions will fill the void. The liberal utopia will be short lived as the call of the minaret will be the new order!
    As for this hopeless Pope, is not his role to teach the faith – he has been asked questions concerning a document he has issued that is causing confusion, probably as intended, he needs to clear up his mess or resign as unable to do the job he has taken on. We are listening Holy father!!!!!!!!!!! Teach us how the words of Christ can be over turned.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén