Beware paradigm shifters

The latest buzzword, amongst those who hunger to water down the Catholic faith, is ‘paradigm shift’. Have you run up against awkward scripture that frustrates your favoured narrative? No problem – ignore that teaching by explaining it is time for a ‘paradigm shift’!

Does the historic teaching of the church contradict a desire to endorse _________? (insert favoured cause) Explain how the Holy Spirit is ‘doing a brave new thing’ encouraging a ‘paradigm shift’. If your audience still seems unsure make clear it is a ‘work of mercy’ and demonise those faithful to the previous historic teaching as outdated ‘rigid and legalistic’. Then most will applaud; certainly politicians, the secular media, cafeteria Catholics, atheists, liberal protestants et al…

Cardinal Tobin, who recently caused scandal by sending a private text- (reading ‘Nighty, night baby. I love you xx’) as a public tweet; and whose explanation (that it was for his sister…) was largely met with scepticism, is the latest to jump on this bandwagon. At a conference endorsing modernist agenda he suggested the church is ‘moving’ in its approach to homosexuality because…. a paradigm shift is underway!

But here is the problem for Cardinal Tobin and other advocates of  modernist revolution within the church. You cannot endorse a paradigm shift if there is only one acceptable paradigm!

This is made clear at Mass when we are told that the new covenant is eternal. It is made clear in Hebrews where, in a passage instructing us to honour marriage, we read ‘Jesus is the same, yesterday, today and forever’. It was spoken by Isaiah  ‘the grass withers, the flowers fade but the Word of God will stand forever’ After his resurrection Jesus made it clear, on the road to Emmaus, teaching how his rising was no ‘paradigm shift’ but a fulfilment of Old Testament promises. Jesus also said “until heaven and earth pass away, not even one iota, nor one stroke of a letter, shall pass away from the law”. 

So how can it be implied, by Tobin et al, that God is now abandoning historic doctrine to do a new thing? A thing, it must be noted, that does not strengthen church teaching but concedes ground to secular concensus and philosophy of the sexual revolution. By all established rules of the church such change is not permissible. And given that those pushing the change can only appeal to sentiment not reason, pleading the cause of mercy but refusing to answer questions with clarity, we ought smell a rat. Might this be a demand for heretical teaching?  Are we being duped into accepting snake oil to ensure comfort from the world?

The Holy Spirit, Word of God, the deposit of faith revealed to Apostles, the Catholic faith -these things being divinely revealed truth  are not for changing. Things might develop naturally but cannot change via contradiction. Because God does not do U-turns. Truth is truth. And this is VERY important. Because when we stop looking to scripture and tradition, to discern the will of God, we are left only with ‘experts’ to tell us which bits to believe and which to discard. We switch from a reliance on objective divine revelation to  subjective discernment imparted by  fallen men. Clericalism writ large. And if the abuse crisis, and rumours of immoral lives within the Vatican, teach us anything – it is that we should not place trust in the Princes of this world but in Christ whose church it is.

So when modernist theologians attempt to seduce you into squaring impossible circles, in the name of mercy and via the ‘paradigm shift’, be extremely cautious. Meditate on scripture, consider the teaching of  Saints. And do read 2 Timothy 4:3 which warns that ‘the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.’ 

Beware Paradigm shifters…I fear they sell us snake oil.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

10 thoughts on “Beware paradigm shifters

    1. The Christian faith isn’t a political body but the body of Christ. It is not about making up our minds or being able to change them at will..it is about earnestly seeking out the mind of God. Change occurs, but only organically and in a way that flows from the truth of Christ. Otherwise we begin to unravel all we stand for. I recommend much further reading on the matter. God does not do U turns and what comes to us from the apostles is not errant human thinking but divinely inspired teaching.

  1. Might I draw your attention to a significant change in traditional teaching? For centuries the church denied suicides a catholic funeral because they died in a state of mortal sin. With the acceptance by the church of modern psychiatric understanding of the concept of ‘the balance of the mind’ being disturbed , suicide was no longer in the vast majority of cases considered to constitute objectively a mortal sin; the benefit of the doubt being given to all suicides with regard to their culpability.
    It is surely not inconceivable that modern understanding of human sexuality might lead to a similar reassessment of the situationt of LGBT persons.

    1. You answer your own point. Benefit of doubt was shown NOT change in teaching. It remains a mortal sin to kill yourself if in your right mind. However if mentally unwell then the conditions for sin might not be met- and once we recognised that many suicidal people are not in their right mind- compassion led to change of praxis.

  2. If,as I believe it will, the nurture argument is eventually proved to be false, then there is a manifestly unjust relationship between the lifetime choices of gay and heterosexual individuals. If gay people are gay through no fault of their own then culpability should be examined.
    After all , if one is born with one leg shorter than the other the church does not forbid limping.

    1. A lot of big Ifs there. Studies on identical twins, amongst others, show it is not simply a biological matter. Besides the church doesn’t condemn being same sex attracted.

      1. No it is not condemned , as long as it is not acted upon. That’s like seeing nothing wrong with hunger as long as nothing is eaten.

        1. Nonsense. If one deprives oneself of food – you die. Being able to say no to sex is vital for morality- as any tempted spouse knows well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.